Copyright ownership and employees
Submit Articles Back to Articles
21 May 2010
In the UK copyright law is governed by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act
1988 ('CDPA'). Section 11 of the CDPA states as follows:
"(1) The author of a work is the first owner of any copyright in it, subject
to the following provisions.
(2) Where a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work, or a film, is made
by an employee in the course of his employment, his employer is the first owner
of any copyright in the work subject to any agreement to the contrary."
As a general rule the author of a work is the person who created it, there
are however some exceptions to this which are set out in section 9 of the CDPA.
For example in the case of a sound recording the author is the producer, in the
case of a film the producer and director and in the case of a computer generated
work the author is the person who made the arrangements necessary to enable the
creation of the work.
The provisions of section 11 CDPA can be contracted out of provided that the
contract is made prior to the creation of the copyright work i.e. it cannot be
done retrospectively. Unlike assignments of copyright there is no requirement
for said contract to be in writing.
Of course in order apply the rules in sections 9 and 11 it is essential to
understand who is and who is not considered to be an employee. This is not a
straightforward area but basically the steps are 1) to ascertain if there is
contract of employment (Parsons v Parsons [1979 FSR 254]); and 2) where there is
a contract it must be established if it is a contract 'of service' (employment
contract) or a contract 'for services' (self-employed). As a general rule where
it is a contract for services copyright will be owned by the contractor.
Having identified that a party is an employee it must then be determined
whether or not the work was created 'in the course of employment', there is
significant case law on this area but the recent case of Burrows v Smith and
Crush  EWHC 22 (Ch) provides a particularly good illustration of how this
area is treated.
Mr Burrows created a game concept called 'Traktrix', at the time of creation
Mr Burrows was a freelancer, later however he applied for a job at Circle
Studios. As part of the application Mr Burrows pitched a number of game ideas
(but not Traktrix). Mr Burrows was successful in the application and upon being
taken on board he pitched a new game which was very similar to Traktrix,
although he didn't admit to having come up with the concept some time earlier.
The company made a number of changes to the concept and came up with 'Traintrax',
unfortunately for them the company went into liquidation and Traintrax was
bought by Mr Smith on behalf of Crush Digital Media Limited. Mr Burrows brought
proceedings against both Mr BUrrows personally and against Crush Digital Media
Limited. The court held that whilst some copyright in the concept of Traktrix
may be owned by Mr Burrows there was no evidence that Crush actually used the
is a trainee solicitor at Lawdit. email@example.com
About the Author
Lawdit Solicitors offer services and
advice for litigation, commercial contracts, Intellectual Property and IT legal
agreements. We are experts in commercial law with a heavy emphasis on
Intellectual Property, Internet and e-commerce law. Lawdit is a member of the
International Trademark Association, the Solicitors' Association of Higher Court
Advocates and we are the appointed Solicitors to the largest webdesign
association in the world, the United Kingdom Website Designers Association.
Follow us @Scopulus_News
Article Published/Sorted/Amended on Scopulus 2010-05-29 22:00:31 in Legal Articles