Font Size

HM Revenue and Customs Brief 43/10

 By

HM Revenue and Customs -Tax Authorities

Tax Articles
Submit Articles   Back to Articles

Issued 12 October 2010

VAT: 'Italian Republic' claims for overpaid VAT – partial exemption implications of the ECJ decision in Nordania Finans

This Brief gives information concerning a review by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) of the proper treatment of claims submitted as a result of the Italian Republic ECJ decision (C-45/95). The claims are for output tax over-declared on car sales where input tax was blocked on the purchase of the cars and typically involve the sale of demonstrator vehicles, courtesy cars and daily rental vehicles by businesses in the motor trade. A large number of such claims were submitted following the House of Lords decision in Fleming/Condé Nast. UK law on the input tax block was changed in 1999 and so these claims are for historic periods only.

Following a review of the implications of the ECJ decision in Nordania Finans, HMRC is of the view that these claims did not take proper account of European case law on partial exemption. As a result HMRC is asking those businesses whose claims have not yet been paid to revise their claims to take account of the partial exemption implications. Where claims have already been repaid by HMRC without making adjustment for partial exemption HMRC is issuing recovery assessments subject to the appropriate time limits.

Further information on partial exemption can be found in Notice 706, Partial Exemption, and the partial exemption section of HMRC VAT guidance.

Background – output tax declared on cars

Until 1 December 1999, input tax on new cars bought by businesses in the motor sector for use in their business before sale was blocked. To prevent double taxation when such cars were sold VAT was chargeable on the margin (if any) over the purchase price. However this still left some output tax payable in many cases. In 1997 the ECJ ruled that the only correct way of preventing double taxation of goods on which no input tax deduction was allowed is for the sale of the goods to be exempt from VAT. In response the former HM Customs & Excise issued Business Brief 23/97 in October 1997 inviting claims for overpaid VAT.

Background – claiming VAT exemption and partial exemption

When UK law says a supply is taxable but European law says it is exempt taxpayers are entitled to claim exemption. However such claims must take into account the effect of the additional exempt supplies on the taxpayer’s ability to deduct input tax (partial exemption).

The effect of partial exemption on motor sector businesses depends on whether cars owned by and used in the business for a limited time (such as demonstrators) can be treated for partial exemption purposes as capital goods used in the business. This is because the sale values of any such goods must be excluded from partial exemption calculations.

Until 2001 it was HM Customs and Excise’s policy that demonstrator cars should not be classified as capital goods and therefore should be included in partial exemption calculations. This resulted in Italian Republic claims being reduced to take account of the partial exemption impact.

In 2001 however, the High Court ruled in JDL Ltd –v– CCE that demonstrator cars were capital goods used in a car dealer’s business. It was therefore accepted that, other things being equal, 'Italian Republic' claims for over-declared output tax need not take partial exemption into account. A number of claims have been repaid by HMRC on that basis.

The ECJ decision in Nordania Finans, case C-98/07

In March 2008 the ECJ delivered its decision in the case of Nordania Finans A/S v Skatteministeriet. This case concerned whether cars bought for leasing followed by sale were capital goods used in the business. Nordania’s business model was to buy cars, lease them for a fixed period of eighteen months and then sell them at auction. Through these two ways of exploiting their assets they realised sufficient funds to cover their direct costs and overheads. The ECJ ruled that the exclusion of the sales, when the sales were an integral part of their business model, would distort Nordania’s partial exemption calculations. The sales should therefore not be seen as sales of capital goods used in Nordania’s business.

After due consideration, HMRC has concluded that Nordania has over-turned JDL. The sale of cars that were bought to be used in a motor sector taxpayer’s business for a limited time and then sold is an integral part of that taxpayer’s business. As such, based on Nordania, it would distort partial exemption calculations to exclude the sale, and the cars cannot be viewed as capital goods used in the business. As a result any claim for over-declared output tax arising from the 'Italian Republic' case must take the impact of partial exemption on deductible input tax into account. Furthermore, in submitting an 'Italian Republic' claim businesses make themselves partly exempt. Therefore it may also be necessary to consider partial exemption implications where there was no consideration of partial exemption when the Italian Republic claim was made and any other claims have subsequently been submitted following Fleming/Condé Nast and for the periods covered by the previous claim.

The way forward

Where businesses have invoked the Italian ECJ decision and any claims have not yet been paid HMRC will be writing to businesses inviting them to submit revised claims which take proper account of the partial exemption implications before any payment is made.

HMRC are reviewing claims which have been repaid without taking proper account of partial exemption and, in appropriate cases, issuing recovery assessments for repayment of tax and statutory interest subject to the time limits in the VAT Act 1994. Default interest will be charged where appropriate. Where payments have been made incorrectly and there is insufficient time to accurately establish the position before assessment time limits expire, HMRC will issue estimated assessments on a best judgement basis. Where this happens HMRC will remain open to working with the businesses concerned to establish the exact impact and amend assessments where appropriate.


About the Author

© Crown Copyright 2010.

A licence is needed to reproduce this article and has been republished for educational / informational purposes only. Article reproduced by permission of HM Revenue & Customs



Follow us @Scopulus_News

Article Published/Sorted/Amended on Scopulus 2010-10-18 13:53:43 in Tax Articles

All Articles

Copyright © 2004-2019 Scopulus Limited. All rights reserved.