IHT - Do Not Just Lend Or Gift It - Document It
Submit Articles Back to Articles
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) guidance which applies from 31 March 2008 states
that there will be greater scrutiny of lifetime transfers. In “IHT and Trusts
Newsletter” HMRC included a note that it intended to pay close attention to such
transfers. The HMRC theme for the documentation of all Estates above and below
the £Nil rate band is similar to the record keeping of the self-employed. There
was further indication of this need to document with both the transfer of the
unused £Nil rate band and jointly owned property.
The HMRC August 2007 “IHT and Trusts Newsletter” states:
“From now until 31 March 2008, when looking at forms IHT200 received on a
death, we will be paying particularly close attention to lifetime transfers. Not
only will we be looking at estates where a form D3 has been completed giving
details of gifts or other transfers of value but we will be reviewing other
aspects of estates which we know can give rise to a lifetime transfers.
These may include:
• Joint assets – gifts can arise on a transfer into joint names or where a
joint owner receives the benefit of withdrawals from accounts funded wholly by
the deceased; • Loans – gifts can arise on the forgiveness of a debt or part of
a debt; • Movement of funds between multiple bank accounts – this can lead to
gifts being overlooked (see below); • Inheritance – gifts can arise if there
have been redistributions of property inherited by the deceased; • Business or
partnership - transfers from a business or partnership will not necessarily
qualify for business relief; • Rights under a pension scheme – a gift may arise
if acts or omissions by a member of a pension scheme have the effect of
increasing the value of benefits passing outside the member’s estate at the
expense of his own estate.
Where the information provided about these aspects is unclear, or incomplete,
there is an increased likelihood that we will ask for further information or
seek an explanation of what has occurred.
In appropriate cases we will open an enquiry and ask you for further
information to satisfy ourselves that all gifts have been included. We will tell
you if the estate is one that has been selected for enquiry in this way. Where
it appears that the accountable persons have been negligent in not disclosing a
gift in the IHT200 we will consider whether a penalty is appropriate”.
So is this HMRC behaviour potentially (please excuse the pun) intimidating or
just HMRC doing what they should be doing, which is checking information
submitted and collecting the correct amount of tax?
The self-employed taxpayer realises they have to keep business records, so
too must the taxpayer whether the Estate falls below the £Nil rate band or
above. Clearly incorrectly recorded transfers could place the Estate above the
£Nil rate band and hence cause a need for review and now there are games to be
played with two £Nil rate bands.
Estates below the £Nil rate band
It will be necessary to keep records of estates below the Inheritance Tax (IHT)
threshold so that the appropriate relief may be claimed when the surviving
HMRC have confirmed that:
“Where someone dies after 9 October 2007 with a nil rate band discretionary
trust in their Will, an appointment of the trust assets in favour of the
surviving spouse or civil partner (before the second anniversary of the death,
but not within the three months immediately following the death) would normally
be treated for IHT purposes as if the assets had simply been left to the
surviving spouse of civil partner outright. Ending the trust in this way could
mean that the £nil rate band was not used in the first death, and so the amount
available for eventual transfer to the surviving spouse of civil partner would
be increased accordingly”.
(Inheritance Tax: Transfer of Unused Nil Rate Band from www.hmrc.gov.uk/pbr2007/supplementary.htm)
So from 9 October 2007 were all those “£Nil rate band protection Wills”
thrown away and started again?
The answer is that all Wills should be looked at in a timely (but unrushed)
manner and the need to revise the Wills and a look at basic angles of loans,
gifts and joint property reviewed.
HMRC’s Brief 71/07 announces that henceforth, when valuing land or building
jointly owned by husband and wife (or by civil partners), HMRC will assume that
section 161(4), Inheritance Tax Act 1984 (IHTA 1984) applies. This means that
the shares of the husband and wife will no longer be separately valued; instead,
the overall value of the shares of both spouses will be determined (the value of
the whole property, if they are the only joint owners), and then divided between
them, accordingly to their fractional shares.
This change of practice follows a review of the decision in Arkwright v
Inland Revenue Commissioners  STC 1323 since when it has been assumed that
section 161(4) applies only to assets held as a number of separate units (for
example shares in a company). The background to Arkwright was that a Special
Commissioner has held that section 161(4) did not apply to jointly owned land or
buildings. That decision was not challenged in the High Court, either by the
Revenue or the Judge. However, the judge allowed the Revenue’s appeal “to the
limited extent” that the Special Commissioner should not have gone on to
consider questions of fact – rather, she should have remitted such questions to
the Land Tribunal. HMRC has now received “legal advice” that section 161(4) does
apply to jointly owned land and buildings.
The new practice will apply where Inheritance Tax Account is received by HMRC
on or after 29 November 2007 (the day after the Brief was published).
There may be cases where section 161(4) treatment is advantageous to the
taxpayer (for example, to establish a higher base cost for capital gains tax
purposes). HMRC state that they will, at the taxpayer’s request, re-open any
valuation concluded on or 16 July 2004 (the date of the decision in the
Arkwright), on the basis that section 161(4) did not apply.
As mentioned in the section on lifetime transfers, making or receiving a
commercial or family loan can have implications with regard to Wills and IHT.
Not all loans can be deducted from a person’s estate.
It is common for an individual to either loan money or to receive money as a
loan and there are complicated rules in notifying HMRC that judge whether that
the loan is allowable as a deduction against the value of the estate or not. In
family situations where a loan is made or received it is often done on an
informal basis with little or no documentation.
Section 162 and 164 of the IHTA 1984 broadly provide that a debt is to be
valued for IHT purposes on the assumption that the obligation will be discharged
and this would include any accrued interest.
In the case of a mortgage or bank loan HMRC will normally accept the
deduction claim on Form D16 (part of the IHT 200) and it will be first set
against the property against which it is charged but where the property is being
passed on to a spouse or civil partner and is exempt the loan will not be
allowed as a deduction against the deceased estate.
The family loan and the commercial loan secured against family assets must
clearly be reviewed as what it seems “a good idea at the time” might cause
problems with the calculation of the Net Estate, the IHT liability and family
A meeting with the family’s Tax Adviser and Lawyer beckons.
The answer is don’t just lend it or gift it, document it!
The same applies to jointly owned assets and lifetime transfers – is
documentation robust enough?
About the Author
Article supplied by Julie Butler F.C.A. Butler & Co, Bowland House, West
Street, Alresford, Hampshire, SO24 9AT. Tel: 01962 735544. Email;
Julie Butler F.C.A. is the author of Tax Planning for Farm and Land
Diversification ISBN: 0754517691 (1st edition) and ISBN:
0754522180 (2nd edition) and Equine Tax Planning ISBN:
0406966540. The third edition of Tax Planning For Farm and Land
Diversification is currently being written and will be published shortly.
To order a copy call Tottel Publishing on 01444 416119.
Follow us @Scopulus_News
Article Published/Sorted/Amended on Scopulus 2008-08-04 14:47:17 in Tax Articles