Font Size

The 2012 Budget The GAAR Proposals And The HNWU

 By

Julie Butler - Expert Author

Tax Articles
Submit Articles   Back to Articles

17 April 2012

The introduction of the proposed GAAR (general anti-avoidance rule) in the 2012 Budget has placed focus on HMRC’s special units for the very rich and “almost very rich”.

“High Net Worth” (HNW) individuals tax affairs are dealt with by a special HMRC unit dedicated to the personal tax affairs of the UK’s wealthiest individuals – the HNWU (High Net Worth Unit).  At first the unit was perceived perhaps cynically to be a way for HMRC to group together all the very wealthy taxpayers, in order to monitor and tax them harder.  The definition of HNW is considered to be wealth of approximately £20 million.

HMRC have brought in a unit underneath the HNWU.  This is known as the “Affluent Unit” which is a new enquiry-focused team for wealthy taxpayers who are categorised as sitting below the HNWU level.  The Affluent Unit was set up in September 2012 and will target people who are typically 50% rate taxpayers (soon to be 45%).  So how do tax advisers make sure tax planning doesn’t become what HMRC views as tax avoidance or, as it is emotively called, ABUSE (general anti-abuse rules – GAAR)?

General Anti-Artificial Rules

The Budget proposals for the introduction of a GAAR result in further uncertainty for those undertaking a legitimate restructuring.  What is the definition of legitimate?  Much of the GAAR suggestions rely on emotive and often undefined language such as ‘exploiting’ and ‘avoiding’.

There are many who consider that the GAAR l17 April 2012egislation cannot be introduced without a clearance procedure before the proposed transaction is undertaken.

It is more than reasonable for an adviser to take an alternative interpretation of legislation to HMRC in a wide variety of circumstances.  It can be useful to have proactive and pre-filing engagement with the HNWUs or more formally via HMRC’s non-statutory clearance process.

What are the advantages of working with the HNWU?

•               Earlier clarification of the facts and important technical issues.

•               Non-confrontational dialogue as opposed to the harsh enquiry environment.

•               Access to HMRC’s technical specialist resource within a realistic timescale.

•               Early certainty in understanding how successful the claim will be and whether litigation is a likely outcome.

There would be those that would argue that the decision as to whether to voluntarily transfer to the HNWU comes down to the personal preference of both adviser and taxpayer and possibly their attitude to risk.  Pro-actively talking to the right people within HMRC can go some way to mitigating risk on both high value and complex transactions and structuring but can also highlight problems to HMRC.

Practical Planning

Every adviser must now try to ensure their clients understand what being in the HNWU or the Affluent Unit means.  This is important for those clients who already belong to the unit and those who could consider migration or will soon be asked to transfer.  Complex family affairs where some members are in the unit and some are not should be top of the list for consideration of a transfer to the HNWU.


About the Author

Supplied by Julie Butler F.C.A. Butler & Co, Bennett House, The Dean, Alresford, Hampshire, SO24 9BH.  Tel: 01962 735544.  Email; j.butler@butler-co.co.uk, Website; www.butler-co.co.uk

Julie Butler F.C.A. is the author of Tax Planning for Farm and Land Diversification (Bloomsbury Professional), Equine Tax Planning ISBN: 0406966540, and Stanley: Taxation of Farmers and Landowners (LexisNexis).



Follow us @Scopulus_News

Article Published/Sorted/Amended on Scopulus 2012-07-05 17:36:17 in Tax Articles

All Articles

Copyright © 2004-2019 Scopulus Limited. All rights reserved.