Breach of Confidential Information
Submit Articles Back to Articles
As a general rule, confidential information cannot be owned. It is usually
just a secret which one person does not want others to know. Once other people
know the information, it no longer "belongs" to that person. Keeping this in
mind is the key to drafting a clause and any agreement.
The following types of information may need to be kept confidential:
- The detailed commercial information provided to the recipient. This can
include everything that the recipient finds out from the disclosing company -
from customer lists to manufacturing processes - unless it falls into certain
excluded categories discussed below.
- The fact that negotiations are taking place and their status. A leak of
this nature is particularly detrimental when a listed company is involved as
it could force the parties to make an announcement or expose them to
allegations of insider dealing. But private companies do not normally want
their employees, customers, suppliers or lenders to know about a proposed deal
until they are confident it will go through. This is particularly true in the
case of an acquisition. One of the oldest tricks used by acquirers is to let
everyone know that the target business is for sale, putting it into a state of
uncertainty, possibly even affecting its value and giving the acquirer a
strong negotiating position.
- The existence of the agreement, its detailed terms and conditions. The
disclosure of this information could also be detrimental to the discloser
(assuming that no listed company is involved and therefore no obligation to
announce under market rules) and cause uncertainty in that it would alert
people to the fact that some major commercial transaction was imminent.
For a breach of confidence claim to succeed, three criteria must be met:
- The information must have the requisite quality of secrecy or
- The information must have been disclosed in circumstances importing
an obligation of confidence.
- There must be an unauthorised use of that information to the
detriment of the party communicating it.
(Coco v A. N. Clark (Engineers) Ltd  RPC 41.) As Megarry J. said
in this case:
"The essence of the duty [of confidentiality] seems more likely to be that of
not using without paying, rather than of not using at all". Once information has
been disclosed, it cannot be made secret again and it is very difficult to
establish the appropriate quantum of damages. Where an injunction is available,
the process is usually slow”.
There is no statutory framework governing ownership or other rights in
confidential information. Each case will be considered on its merits.
For further information, please contact Izaz Ali
About the Author
Lawdit Solicitors offer services and
advice for litigation, commercial contracts, Intellectual Property and IT legal
agreements. We are experts in commercial law with a heavy emphasis on
Intellectual Property, Internet and e-commerce law. Lawdit is a member of the
International Trademark Association, the Solicitors' Association of Higher Court
Advocates and we are the appointed Solicitors to the largest webdesign
association in the world, the United Kingdom Website Designers Association.
Follow us @Scopulus_News
Article Published/Sorted/Amended on Scopulus 2007-06-23 13:30:49 in Legal Articles