Defamation law - when are the words defamatory
Submit Articles Back to Articles
14 August 2009
There is no set definitions of the word defamatory. There are
however guidelines to consider if you feel you have been 'defamed':
1. Do the words used lower you in the estimation of right
2. Do the words tend to expose you to hatred, contempt or
3. Do the words used cause others to shun or avoid you?
There are a plethora of cases that are relevant:
Berkoff v Burchill and Another. In this case it was held
that a statement that a person was hideously ugly did not fall into the category
of statement that were defamatory by virtue of making people shun/avoid the
Instead it was held that the words used to describe the claimant
could expose him to ridicule and for this reason were held to be defamatory.
If the judge considers that the words are capable of being
defamatory then the question of whether they are actually defamatory is decided
by a jury.
To do this the jury must look at the statement in a context in
its effect on an ordinary reasonable fair minded reader.
For example in the case of Lewis v Daily Telegraph it was
held that the words were not defamatory as an ordinary reader would not presume
the guilt of the individual simply from reading the story.
It has to be shown that the that the article taken as a whole is
Jane Coyle is a trainee solicitor at Lawdit and can be
contacted at email@example.com
About the Author
Lawdit Solicitors offer services and
advice for litigation, commercial contracts, Intellectual Property and IT legal
agreements. We are experts in commercial law with a heavy emphasis on
Intellectual Property, Internet and e-commerce law. Lawdit is a member of the
International Trademark Association, the Solicitors' Association of Higher Court
Advocates and we are the appointed Solicitors to the largest webdesign
association in the world, the United Kingdom Website Designers Association.
Follow us @Scopulus_News
Article Published/Sorted/Amended on Scopulus 2009-09-30 12:37:51 in Legal Articles