Online bets fail the Macrossan Test
Submit Articles Back to Articles
The Patents Court found this week that an invention relating to a method of
placing online bets lay solely in the field of business methods, and so failed
the third step in Aerotel/Macrossan as laid down in the Court of Appeal. Any
such failure meant that the invention was excluded. The case Oneida Indian
Nation  EWHC 954 (Pat), 2 May 2007 (Christopher Floyd QC.
Article 52(2) of the European Patent Convention (EPC) states that:
The following in particular shall not be regarded as inventions...
(c) schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or
doing business, and programs for computers;
(d) presentations of information.
The Court of Appeal, in Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd (and others) and
Macrossan’s Application ( EWCA Civ 1371 (Aerotel); Approved the following
four-step test for patentability under section 1(2):
- Properly construe the claim.
- Identify the actual contribution.
- Ask whether it falls solely within the excluded subject matter.
- Check whether the actual or alleged contribution is actually
technical in nature.
About the Author
Lawdit Solicitors offer services and
advice for litigation, commercial contracts, Intellectual Property and IT legal
agreements. We are experts in commercial law with a heavy emphasis on
Intellectual Property, Internet and e-commerce law. Lawdit is a member of the
International Trademark Association, the Solicitors' Association of Higher Court
Advocates and we are the appointed Solicitors to the largest webdesign
association in the world, the United Kingdom Website Designers Association.
Follow us @Scopulus_News
Article Published/Sorted/Amended on Scopulus 2007-05-15 18:08:40 in Legal Articles