Font Size

Online bets fail the Macrossan Test

 By


Legal Articles
Submit Articles   Back to Articles

The Patents Court found this week that an invention relating to a method of placing online bets lay solely in the field of business methods, and so failed the third step in Aerotel/Macrossan as laid down in the Court of Appeal. Any such failure meant that the invention was excluded. The case Oneida Indian Nation [2007] EWHC 954 (Pat), 2 May 2007 (Christopher Floyd QC.

Article 52(2) of the European Patent Convention (EPC) states that:

The following in particular shall not be regarded as inventions...

(c) schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or doing business, and programs for computers;

(d) presentations of information.

The Court of Appeal, in Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd (and others) and Macrossan’s Application ([2006] EWCA Civ 1371 (Aerotel); Approved the following four-step test for patentability under section 1(2):

  •  Properly construe the claim.
  •  Identify the actual contribution.
  •  Ask whether it falls solely within the excluded subject matter.
  •  Check whether the actual or alleged contribution is actually technical in nature.

About the Author

Lawdit Solicitors offer services and advice for litigation, commercial contracts, Intellectual Property and IT legal agreements. We are experts in commercial law with a heavy emphasis on Intellectual Property, Internet and e-commerce law. Lawdit is a member of the International Trademark Association, the Solicitors' Association of Higher Court Advocates and we are the appointed Solicitors to the largest webdesign association in the world, the United Kingdom Website Designers Association.


Follow us @Scopulus_News

Article Published/Sorted/Amended on Scopulus 2007-05-15 18:08:40 in Legal Articles

All Articles

Copyright © 2004-2020 Scopulus Limited. All rights reserved.